alt.comp.freeware
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT] Just how "legit" is Legit Anon?

Subject: Re: [OT] Just how "legit" is Legit Anon?
From: hummingbird
Date: 31 Aug 2008 19:54:29 -0000
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:06:54 -0500  'Ron May'
wrote this on alt.comp.freeware:

>And you don't see BB, HB or MH suggest an *IGNORE* strategy.  

MH has described his troubles connecting to usenet and readers 
should not be surprised the he is more concerned with that than 
with maintaining a list of cultists to ignore.

BB has explained that he does not use ignore because he considers 
it to be a form of censorship. Surely even someone with your 
limited capacity should be able to understand that MoRon.

For my part I have extensively described my system of filtering 
using Hamster Classic. I have it configured to keep a file of people 
I say I'm ignoring so their posts are prominently displayed on my 
screen. I prioritise replying to the ones I've said I am ignoring. 
I suggest that strategy to all anti-fascists.

>What that reveals is that they clearly recognize the tide of opinion is
>clearly not in their favor.

It saddens me only slightly that so far only two other people see 
the grave threat posed by the forces of SB. I believe the truth 
will out. In the meantime I am happy to continue articulating the 
SB problem since the other two are fairly inarticulate despite their 
strength of perception.


-- 
   "All truth passes through three stages.
   First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
   and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
   (Arthur Schopenhauer)



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy